Monday, August 20News That Matters

Here Are All The Ways Trump Has Tried To Explain That Infamous Trump Tower Meeting


President Donald Trump on Sunday said the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between his eldest son and a Kremlin-linked lawyer was intended to obtain dirt on presidential rival Hillary Clinton. He insisted the meeting was “totally legal” and that he “did not know about it.”

Fake News reporting, a complete fabrication, that I am concerned about the meeting my wonderful son, Donald, had in Trump Tower. This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics – and it went nowhere. I did not know about it!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 5, 2018

In defending Donald Trump Jr., the president undercut his son’s initial claims that the meeting was primarily about U.S. adoptions of Russian children.

The Trump Tower meeting is problematic because it’s illegal for candidates and their campaigns to accept or solicit anything of value from a foreign national. The president has repeatedly distanced himself from the meeting, saying he had no prior knowledge about it. And, amid the increasingly inconsistent statements from Trump and his team, special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russians during the 2016 election has ramped up.

Here’s how the accounts about the infamous meeting have evolved.

The Trump Tower meeting was ‘primarily’ to address Russian adoptions.

The New York Times in July 2017 first revealed the existence of the meeting between the president’s son and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya. In a statement to the Times, Trump Jr. told said that the meeting was to “primarily” discuss the adoption of Russian children by Americans. The statement soon proved to be incomplete.

Pressed for more information, Trump Jr. a day later released emails in which he accepted the meeting after being offered damaging information on Clinton. Trump Jr.’s admission contradicted his father’s February 2017 statement that “nobody that I know of” had any contacts with foreign entities during the election and previous similar statements from his campaign.

Days after Trump Jr. released his emails, White House press secretary Sean Spicer repeated the already-debunked claim that the meeting was about adoptions. He also claimed that the election was not discussed at all during the meeting.

“There was nothing as far as we know that would lead anyone to believe that there was anything except for discussion about adoption and the Magnitsky Act,” Spicer said. The Magnitsky Act placed sanctions on Russia, which retaliated by banning the adoption of Russian children by Americans.

The meeting was standard opposition research.

Trump downplayed the meeting on July 13, 2017, saying most people would have taken the meeting. “It’s called opposition research,” he said at a joint conference with French President Emmanuel Macron.

The president claimed it did not last long and “nothing came of the meeting.”

He made similar comments in a tweet the same week.

Most politicians would have gone to a meeting like the one Don jr attended in order to get info on an opponent. That’s politics!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 17, 2017

Trump was not involved in drafting his son’s misleading
statement.

On July 31, 2017, The Washington Post reported that Trump had dictated his son’s initial misleading statement about the Trump Tower meeting being about adoptions.

Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow repeatedly denied that the president was involved in drafting the statement.

“The president didn’t sign off on anything,” Sekulow told ABC. “He was coming back from the G-20. The statement that was released Saturday was released by Donald Trump Jr., I’m sure in consultation with his lawyers. The president wasn’t involved in that.”

Trump was involved in the statement but did not personally dictate it.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders in August 2017 said Trump did not personally dictate the statement, but he “offered suggestion like any father would do.”

Trump dictated and signed off on his son’s statement.

In a Jan. 29, 2018, memo to Mueller, Trump attorneys John Dowd and Sekulow contradicted Sanders by saying Trump did dictate Trump Jr.’s statement. The Times published a copy of that letter in June.

Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani also told Talking Points Memo in June that it was the legal team’s “final position” that Trump was behind the statement. He said Sekulow had made a “mistake.” Sekulow said on Sunday that he had been mistaken earlier due to “bad information.”

Trump did not know about the meeting.

CNN in July reported that Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney, is prepared to testify that Trump had prior knowledge of the meeting. If true, Cohen’s testimony would undermine repeated denials by Trump and his team that he knew nothing about the meeting until The New York Times asked him about it in July 2017. Cohen alleges Trump Jr. had told his father about the Russians’ offer and Trump approved it, according to CNN.

In response to the CNN report, Trump tweeted, “I did NOT know of the meeting with my son, Don jr.”

If it’s revealed that Trump actually knew about the meeting beforehand, then Trump Jr. could be in legal trouble because he testified before Congress that his father was not aware of it.

Trump admits the Trump Tower meeting was to get dirt on Clinton.

On Sunday, Trump completely contradicted past accounts of the meeting. The president tweeted that the Trump Tower meeting was “to get information on an opponent,” the clearest indication to date that the initial Trump Jr. statement was not entirely true.

RELATED COVERAGE

Let’s block ads! (Why?)





Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.